Boateng and 7 crazy contracts in world football history

Boateng is the latest controversial buying and selling case throughout the length of the village. The following are the 7 most classic examples.


1. Bebe

The legendary history of Sir Alex Ferguson has been greatly affected by the contract named Bebe in August 2010 for a fee of 9 million euros. The Portuguese did not leave any mark after four years of playing in the Red Devils with a total of 2 Premier League appearances with 3 loan times. In 2014, he left the team at Old Trafford and switched to Benfica for 3 million euros.

Những thương vụ điên rồ nhất trong lịch sử bóng đá thế giới - Bóng Đá

2. Kevin-Prince Boateng

Leaving Munir El Haddadi to Sevilla left Barcelona lacking a quality contingency plan. Therefore, the La Liga champion needs to add another quality attack star with reasonable spending. Everyone was surprised by the fact that the 31-year-old Boateng became the chosen person.

Những thương vụ điên rồ nhất trong lịch sử bóng đá thế giới - Bóng Đá

Accordingly, the owner of the Nou Camp will borrow the former AC Milan striker until the end of the season from Sassuolo, with a purchase clause of 8 million euros in the summer. Most likely, Boateng will play as a virtual number 9 in the upcoming Barcelona shirt.

3. Sol Campbell

The one-time Sol Campbell was a noisy player in the transfer market when he decided to switch to Notts County (in League Two) in 2009; with salary of £ 40,000 / week. However, he quickly realized he was tricked because the team could not afford to pay compensation. Campbell quickly left in 2010.

Những thương vụ điên rồ nhất trong lịch sử bóng đá thế giới - Bóng Đá

4. Andy Carroll

The £ 35 million contract named Carroll is a failed investment by Liverpool chairman John W Henry. The England striker is seen as a replacement for striker Fernando Torres to move to Chelsea. However, the constant injury caused the star born in 1989 to not be able to show much to teammate Luis Suarez on attack. After 3 years, he contributed only 6 goals in The Kop shirt.

Những thương vụ điên rồ nhất trong lịch sử bóng đá thế giới - Bóng Đá

5. Javier Mascherano & Carlos Tevez

After a level performance with Corinthians, the Argentine star duo received much attention from Real Madrid, Barcelona, ​​Juventus. However, their next stop was an anonymous West Ham United in Europe in 2006.

The only contribution from the pair is to help the Premier League boss succeed. 12 months later, Tevez moved to Man United, while Mascherano chose Liverpool.

Những thương vụ điên rồ nhất trong lịch sử bóng đá thế giới - Bóng Đá

6. Victor Valdes

Spending a successful time with Barcelona with three Champions League titles, Valdes left the Spanish side and joined Man United. However, he could not occupy a regular performance under coach Louis van Gaal; and joined as a lender at Standard Liege in January 2016. High age makes him head for Middlesbrough F.C. a year later.

Những thương vụ điên rồ nhất trong lịch sử bóng đá thế giới - Bóng Đá

7. Jonathan Woodgate

In 2004, Woodgate was a quality defender in the Premier League. Therefore, it is not surprising that Real Madrid decided to recruit the English player to Santiago Bernabeu Stadium. Despite possessing great potential, a serious thigh injury caused his career at White Vulture to be zero.

Những thương vụ điên rồ nhất trong lịch sử bóng đá thế giới - Bóng Đá

In 2006, Woodgate returned to England in Middlesbrough in the form of a loan and was bought shortly thereafter.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Countries strive to promote gender equality

Japan, England, Switzerland, Saudi Arabia are some countries in the world that have made progress in promoting gender equality, facilitating better living and working for women.


In fact, gender inequality is still dull, especially in Asian countries, which have traditionally been “respectful of men and women” since ancient times. However, when society is growing, the role and position of women is also increasing.

JAPAN

To achieve the goal of “Womenomics” to promote the important role of women in the reconstruction of the economy, Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe has adjusted a series of policies to “untie” and empower women. This female country helps millions of women participate in the labor market while still fulfilling their family life.

Since 2014, Japan has increased maternity wages for mothers in the first 6 months after birth from 50% to 67% of the basic salary and received all before the maternity leave.

Các quốc gia nỗ lực thúc đẩy bình đẳng giới - Ảnh 1.

Meanwhile, to solve the problem of babysitting, the Japanese government aims to secure additional seats for 500,000 babies, as of the end of 2017. In addition, ministries and businesses also implement many initiatives to support women like working from home or flexible hours.

UNITED OF KINGDOM

At the end of 2016, the wage gap between men and women in the UK dropped to its lowest level since this data was recorded nearly 20 years ago. According to data from the National Bureau of Statistics, the wage gap between male and female workers is at 9.4%, while in 1997 this difference was 17.4%.

These encouraging figures come from the UK Government, which has implemented many measures including strengthening the right to work and receive equal wages for all male and female workers on condition that they meet is required by the employer.

SAUDI ARABIA

On September 27, 2016, more than 14,000 Saudi Arabia women signed a petition to terminate the women’s guardian system, changing the rule “women need men’s permission” to travel or work. This is the first time a petition of this type has been issued with such a large number of signatures.

Các quốc gia nỗ lực thúc đẩy bình đẳng giới - Ảnh 2.

Under Saudi Arabia’s current law, all women must have a male guardian, usually a father, husband or brother. They must ask the guardian’s permission if they want to travel, work, get married, rent a house, even get medical treatment. In addition, they are also prohibited from driving.

SWITZERLAND

Women in Switzerland may be offered an extra year after the House of Representatives has voted through increasing the retirement age for women to 65, equal to the retirement age of men. This was at the end of 2016. Previously, the Senate of this country also voted. This proposal may be put on referendum before becoming a law.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thousands Of Women March For Equal Rights In The US

Thousands of women gathered in Washington DC and cities across the United States on the occasion of the first year of President Donald Trump’s inauguration, to appeal for equal rights on wages and medical care, to condemn the status of sexual harassment, and to encourage women to run for election.


Pilgrims also speak up about other issues, such as racial equality, gun control, immigration protection, and conservative efforts to withdraw funding from Planned Parenthood.

It is estimated that the number of people attending the march in Washington is lower than last year. But marches are also taking place in other major cities across the country such as New York, Philadelphia, Los Angeles; Chicago, Denver in Colorado state, Charlotte in North Carolina, and Palm Beach in Florida, where the president used to go on vacation. Las Vegas will hold a rally on Sunday to coincide with an effort to mobilize voter registration. The organizers are targeting the fluctuating states (where Democratic and Republican candidates have a similar chance of winning) and hope to register a million new voters online.

Người tham gia tuần hành trên Đại lộ 6 ở Quận Manhattan, Thành phố New York, ngày 20 tháng 1, 2018.

These gatherings were held to continue the women’s march last year that took place immediately after President Trump’s inauguration. Many women in the march raised their opposition to the incumbent president, who had been accused of sexual misconduct by at least 19 women.

In the past year, stories of unequal wages for women and sexual harassment from powerful men have become the top topic in the national dialogue. Dozens of men, including filmmaker Harvey Weinstein, Oscar-winning actor Kevin Spacey, NBC morning host Matt Lauer, and Democratic Party Senator Al Franken, lost or resign for accusations of sexual harassment.

Women also marched in Rome in Italy, Kampala in Uganda, Frankfurt in Germany, and Osaka in Japan, to protest sexual harassment. The marches are also planned in Beijing, China; Buenos Aires, Argentina; and Nairobi, Kenya.

On Friday, anti-abortion activists held their own march in Washington, an annual event called March for Life. President Trump and Vice President Mike Pence gave a speech to the crowd through video streaming from the White House Rose Garden.

Những người tuần hành đi ngang qua Nhà Trắng ở Washington, ngày 20 tháng 1, 2018.

“We are always with you”, Mr. Trump told the protesters against abortion. Mr. Pence told the crowd that Mr. Trump was the “strongest supporter of life in American history“.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Should German Football Continue The “50 + 1” Policy?

Should or should not continue with the policy “50 + 1” (minimum 51% of each club’s shares must be owned by team members), a major controversial topic in Germany in recent years.


Then the topic became more interesting when Leipzig, the thorn in the eyes of the Germans to win the Champions League directly in 2017/18, is it the time for the Germans to untie themselves for their thoughts?

Many people wonder why Germans hate such privatization of football, and it is a very long story about German history. In 1806, Emperor Napoleon’s army took over the Prussian kingdom, a fierce battle broke out in Jena and Auerstedt. Losing the battle, Prussia was subjected to French occupation, but at the same time created a premise for nationalism to rise. In particular, the building of the elite of the army General Gerhard David von Scharnhorst places on top and the foundation is the physical improvement program undertaken by Friedrich GutsMuths.

Bóng đá Đức có nên tiếp tục chính sách “50+1”?

Associations and clubs about “Turnen” (Fitness) were established. Note that other gymnastics are completely sporty, because there is no winning or losing, but aiming at uniting a nation that was occupied at that time, with the goal of defeating the French. Over time, the influence of fitness clubs spread throughout Prussia. On the contrary, football faces the skepticism of the majority of Germans who think that this is a problem that separates society, so the sport must join gymnastics clubs if they want to survive. With the core principles: Non-profit, community-oriented, benefits for society.

This explains why even though the German League was born in 1903, it was not until 1963 that the Bundesliga – the league championship for professional teams – was born. However, despite starting to operate professionally, the clubs remain loyal to the original principle. And to keep that guideline throughout history, the principle of “50 + 1” is something that immobile with the Germans to keep the team always belong to the community. But it seems time for this principle to become obsolete.

Throughout the length of the Champions League history, apart from Bayern with the backs of giants like Adidas, Audi and Allianz, the remaining German teams rarely compete for the championship. They only had Hamburg in 1983 and Dortmund in 1997 were two rare cases. While in C2 Cup and C3 Europe, they are also completely outdone compared to rivals from England, Italy and Spain, although Germany is always at the top of the world. This reflects that the “50 + 1” policy undermines the competitiveness of German teams. In fact, apart from Bayern, few clubs are able to recruit contracts worth 40-50 million euros, while being regularly “sucked in” by European big men. It is a matter of money, which will determine even greater success in modern football.

Bayern always dominated the first place because they were the richest, while the rest could not create a breakthrough in budget. Behind Bayern and Dortmund are always 6-7 teams competing for two Champions League places, it is also attractive because the team is not too outstanding but when it comes to Europe, it is often eliminated early. Leverkusen as well as Schalke, M’gladbach, or Bremen. Football is certainly the race of money, maybe today Germany still despises Leipzig, but as Bayern President Uli Hoeness once said, it will be time for Germany to accept this fact.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10 Largest Non-Profit Organizations Of The World

Thanks to the names on this list, the world is getting better.


1. Mayo Clinic/Foundation

Kết quả hình ảnh cho Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic is the largest non-profit organization of the United States focusing primarily on the field of medical research. For more than 100 years of operation, Mayo’s principle is to provide patients with the best care based on research, training and clinical practice. All income of this fund is used to upgrade services, train medical doctors and support treatment for patients.

2. Feeding America

Kết quả hình ảnh cho Feeding America

Feeding America was previously known as America’s Second-Harvest. It is also because it focuses mainly on the aspect of hunger elimination, through a series of member food banks. The principle of this organization is respect, management and responsibility, cooperation, speed, service, integrity and diversity.

3. Catholic Charities USA

Kết quả hình ảnh cho Catholic Charities USA

This Catholic organization is one of the largest charities in the United States with the mission to support those in need, to enforce justice and to call all churches and benefactors to charity. In 2008, Catholic Charities USA helped over 8 million people.

4. Red Cross

Kết quả hình ảnh cho Red Cross

This organization is always true to the principle of serving people through their disaster relief activities around the world. In order to alleviate the pain and suffering of unfortunate people, Red Cross calls for the support of volunteers, sponsors and partners on a wide network. It can be said that this is one of the most well-known names and also received the deepest appreciation of many people around the globe.

5. AmeriCares

Kết quả hình ảnh cho AmeriCares

AmeriCares provides humanitarian and medical aid around the world, you will find its name present in many relief activities for natural disasters, floods or earthquakes. The organization also focuses primarily on emergency response and health care recovery. In addition, AmeriCares actively participates in support when epidemics break out in people’s daily lives.

6. Feed the Children

Kết quả hình ảnh cho Feed the Children

With the principle “there is no child or family to go to bed while hungry”, Feed the Children tries to address basic human needs: food and nutrition, water and sanitation, education and health… In general, this organization tries to show individuals how to take care of themselves and their families. In addition, Feed the Children is also very enthusiastic in emergency relief activities.

7. United Way

Kết quả hình ảnh cho United Way

United Way is one of the largest non-profit organizations with a worldwide reach. Its goal is to provide people with tools, education and health to explore their own potential. It also encourages people to participate in activities of mutual care with high concentration on families and individuals.

8. Salvation Army

Kết quả hình ảnh cho Salvation Army

In fact, the Salvation Army is an organization of Christian churches, tasked with propagating the teachings and helping those in need of food and clothing.

9. Gifts in Kind

Kết quả hình ảnh cho Gifts in Kind

Gifts in Kind is a charity of the most unique type in the world. Specifically, it does not give direct money to people who need support but instead contact partners to give gifts to people. In fact, the debate between money or goods is inherently harsh in charitable activities, but after all, Kind Gifts in Kindness is working together to build a better world.

10. YMCA

Kết quả hình ảnh cho YMCA

With over 160 years of operation, the YMCA is one of the most famous non-profit organizations in the world. Its direction is to strengthen and create opportunities for learning and development through education and individual and extensive training programs.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Controversy About The Legitimacy Of Bitcoin In India To The Supreme Court

The lack of a clear legal policy for crypto currencies like Bitcoin has made a petition letter sent straight to the Supreme Court of India, the most powerful judiciary in the South Asian nation.


Bitcoin is not currently recognized as a legitimate means of payment in India. However, no one said it was illegal. The official stance, according to a notice issued by the central bank of India in February, writes: “… the bank does not license/authorize any institution or company to conduct a good business trading Bitcoin or any electronic currency; investors who do business with Bitcoin will have to take risks for their own actions”.

In an effort to erase ambiguity, a lawyer aroused this issue by filing a petition of group interests (Public Interest Litigation – PIL) on the Supreme Court on November 3.

This petition was only released in the past few days, when the Court representative revealed that this was a request from Dwaipayan Bhowmick to urge the country’s government to quickly establish a “Bitcoin flow management” mechanism and make sure it can be audited.

The PIL version contains: “The lack of a solid mechanism to set up a legal framework is making a lot of loop holes, eventually leading to the inability to audit or monitor bitcoin transactions and transfers together pre-algorithm”.

We will mobilize ourselves

Indeed, the fact that it is unmanaged or recognized by the Government has frustrated the Indian industry, so much so that they have to formulate a self-monitoring institution earlier this year. Standardization of procedures for Customer Information Management (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) is one of the main focus of this apparatus, besides acting as a supervisory body for the scene community report on the pre-algorithm scams in India.

Kết quả hình ảnh cho Tranh cãi về tính hợp pháp của Bitcoin tại Ấn Độ lên đến Toà án Tối cao

Indian officials then established the “Virtual Monetary Commission”, which is a collection of representatives from ministries and departments related to the financial sector who have many cases of researching and proposing a regulatory framework domestic pre-algorithm segmentation.

The role of the Central Bank

And yet, the petition also “blames” the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) – the country’s central bank – and the Securities and Exchange Commission of India (SEBI), said that these two agencies are always “push” responsibility for each other in electronic money monitoring.

Kết quả hình ảnh cho Tranh cãi về tính hợp pháp của Bitcoin tại Ấn Độ lên đến Toà án Tối cao

“Needless to say, RBI and SEBI are trying to push responsibility for the other when constantly arguing over the issue so calling Bitcoin currency or goods”, the petition stressed. PIL then called on the Supreme Court to issue appropriate guidelines for managing the bitcoin flow (and electronic money) and ensure that the state treasury could audit it.

The fact that a group of lawsuit petitions was submitted to the Supreme Court only appeared a week after RBI said it still could not consider Bitcoin as a means of payment or money transfer. Besides, the central bank is in the process of building its own legal algorithm currency, which is the future replacement for the current rupee local currency.

 

 

 

 

 

 

What gender equality is and the consequences of gender inequality

According to the United Nations, gender equality means that women and men enjoy the same conditions to fully realize human rights and have the opportunity to contribute and enjoy the development achievements of society in general. In the US, social organizations take more than 70 years (from 1848 until 1920) to fight and give women some basic rights such as: Right to protection; equal rights for black women in particular and women in general; improving living conditions, working wages and voting rights in the United States. Some human rights activists sacrifice their lives to fight for these rights. However, in many other countries, gender inequalities still exist.

According to statistics, there are 77% of men in the role of the main labor force. While women account for only about 50% or less of them (in some countries, the number of women in the main labor force is much less). The income that women receive on average is only about 77% of men; ie still 23% lower. For every $ 1 a man makes, Latin American women earn only 56 cents and African-American women earn about 64 cents (or more than half). 62 million girls are denied access to education worldwide (United Nations data). Every year, up to 15 million girls under the age of 18 are forced to involve in child marriage and the marriage is arranged by parents. Four out of five victims of trafficking are female (Malala fund data). Up to 125 million women and girls are victims of female genital mutilation worldwide. There are at least 1000 murders of women and girls because of family honor every year in India and Pakistan. One in five female students is a victim of sexual assault at a school or lecture hall. In the United States, every 15 seconds a woman will be beaten by her husband or boyfriend (domestic violence).

Gender equality is not just about liberating women, but also liberating men. When it comes to promoting men and lowering women, not only are women affected, but men are also affected. For example, the notion of men being strong, not crying, not being able to express emotions is one of the reasons for the 3 times higher rate of male suicide in women, and shorter life expectancy. Many men have psychological disorders but do not dare to seek help because they are afraid of being “weak” or “lack of masculinity”. Not to mention, if they pursue arts, they will be disparaged and say “weak”, “woman”, “gay” …

The battle against criminals in our politics is not over yet

The campaign for decriminalization of politics is high on the national agenda. The role of judiciary and civil society in highlighting the menace of criminalization and ways to curb the trend has been historic. The order of the Hon’ble Supreme Court on March 10, 2014 has very long range impact in terms of remedy. The bench headed by Justice RM Lodha of Hon’ble Supreme Court has ordered for expediting the proceedings against sitting MPs and MLAs in criminal cases and has further set a deadline for trial court to complete the hearing of the cases within a year of framing of charges.

It has further provided that the trial court need to give explanation to the Chief Justice of the respective High Court if the trial is not completed within a year. The bench observed that the proceedings should be conducted on a day-to-day basis in order to decide the case within the prescribed time limit.

If effectively implemented, this order has far reaching consequences in cleansing the politics of the country. Firstly, it would deter the criminals from seeking tickets as this would expose them to the prescribed limit of one year for the judicial verdict on the charges. Secondly, the political parties who are sensitive to the number game in terms of capturing power would shy away from taking risk of giving tickets to candidates with criminal background as any conviction of sitting MLA/MP would result in vacancy in the State Assembly and in the Parliament as the case may be which could directly impact the tenuous majority of the ruling party. The judgment of March 10, 2014 has come at a very opportune time as the parties are actively engaged in selecting candidates for forthcoming elections to Parliament and few State Assemblies

The Public Interest Litigation was filed by an NGO, Public Interest Foundation in 2010-11. This PIL was admitted on grounds that the entry of criminals amounts to coercion in the electoral process and the free exercise of vote and ultimate choice is compromise. The petition has made four prayers. Firstly, it sought relief for the issuance of guidelines to ensure that those charges with serious criminal offences are disqualified to contest the elections to Parliament and State Legislature. Second prayer was for laying down six months time period for judicial determination of the chargesheet by the competent court. Thirdly, direction to the Government for enacting appropriate legislation so as to debar those charged with serious criminal offences contesting elections and lastly, declare the provisions of section 8(4) of the Representation of People Act, 1951 as unconstitutional.

The interested parties, i.e. Election Commission of India and the Union Government were given due notice by the apex court. Fortunately, the Election Commission concurred with the prayer made in the PIL. However, the Union of India did not play ball with the campaign against decriminalization and raised preliminary objection that the prayer falls in the domain of parliamentary legislation as policy matter and cannot be heard by Hon’ble Supreme Court. However, the bench of the apex court was sensitive to the cause and sought the recommendations the Law Commission on the issue of disqualification once the charge sheet is framed and the penalty under section 125A of RPA, 1951 in cases where falls affidavit is filed by the candidate. The Law Commission gave its recommendation to the apex court.

In order to appreciate the cancerous feature of our democracy, few statistical details would be sufficient for a diagnostic conclusion. In the 15th Lok Sabha constituted in 2009, 162 Lok Sabha MPs out of a strength of 543, had serious criminal cases like murder, attempt to murder, kidnapping, robbery and rape. As per the ADR report, the average pendency of these criminal cases has been seven years. Alarmingly, there were pending cases between 20-29 years on nine MPs. This would be sufficient to conclude that muscle and money power has played important role in the spread of the cancer and also in the obstruction of justice. In this regard, section 8(4) of the RPA, 1951 only added fuel to the fire. It perpetuated the continuity of even convicted legislators. This section provided that the convicted legislator would not be disqualified where revision/application has been preferred within three months from the date of conviction judgment.

Hon’ble Supreme Court in its judgment of 10 July 2013 gave a death blow to the protection under section 8(4). In the case of Union of India vs. Lily Thomas, it declared the provisions of 8(4) as unconstitutional and debarred elected representatives from continuing in office upon conviction. The order of March 10, 2014 has to be appreciated in the background of the earlier judgment as it now sets a time limit on judicial determination of the charge sheeted representative. However, the battle is not finished yet. The political parties may continue to field candidates with serious criminal cases because of their winnability factor. The gross misuse of muscle power and money can still prolong the time period between investigation and filing of the chargesheet. Thus, it would be seriously compromise the intent of the judgment dated July 10, 2013 mentioned earlier and also the order of March 10, 2014. The first prayer of the PIL is the panacea for curbing the entry of criminals in politics. It seeks that any person charge sheeted with serious and heinous offences attracting a sentence of five years or more should be debarred from contesting election. This has been strongly recommended by Justice Verma Committee report on Amendments to Criminal Law (January 23, 2013). In this battle, the civil society must lead. Even the order of March 10, 2014 can only be effectively implemented if the watchfull eyes of the civil society is able to keep track on the progress of the judicial proceedings.

By (N. Misra is ex-Chairman, TRAI and Director, Public Interest Foundation; Email: director@publicinterestfoundation.com

(This article was published in Indian Express on 25 March, 2014 and Dainik Bhaskar on 25 March 2014 )

No place for Doubting Thomases in the State Funding for elections

In a parliamentary democracy the citizens have the political rights constitutionally ensured to make all important choice in government formation by participating in the election process.  The role of political parties is critical as they mobilize public support on their ideology, programme and promises.  The scale of support is manifested through election process. Political parties also perform the important function of informing and educating the citizens about the performance of the government including their shortcomings.

The Representation of People Act (RPA), 1951 makes it mandatory for any association or body of individuals calling itself a political party to make an application to the Election Commission of India (ECI) for its registration.  The sole reference to political parties in the Constitution of India features in the Tenth Schedule, which deals with the disqualification of a person for being a member of either House of Parliament or the Legislative Assembly/Council on grounds of defection.   The RPA, 1951 is the primary law regulating elections in the country.  It is important to make appropriate provision in our Constitution and the RPA, 1951 to facilitate effective regulation of parties by the ECI.  We may perhaps refer to the German law which recognizes the political parties in the formation of political will of the people and requires an internal democracy within the party and transparency in accounting assets and expenditure concerning the party activity.

Political funding is crucial to sustain the activities of any political party.  The expenditure relating to election alone may be termed as campaign finance. This article embraces the term campaign funding to imply the part of the campaign finance funded by the State.  Campaign funding is for conducting competitive election campaign and finance various election related activities in a time frame prescribed by the ECI.  Campaign finance refers to all funds that are raised and spent in order to promote candidates, parties or policies in the electoral contest.  Funds mobilized for elections have a significant impact on the electoral outcome.  Little wonder then that the so-called level playing field of an election arena is heavily tilted towards those who have the deep pockets to influence electoral success.

Political parties raise funds from both private and public sources.  The candidates in the electoral fray also raise funds, sometimes through questionable means.  There is a growing nexus between the political parties and the corporate, organized mafia and other nefarious entities.  The donations to the political parties and the candidates are often in the expectation of quid pro quo which invariably is not in national interest.  The obvious appended hazard is the unsavory role of black money.

State funding of election campaign is often dismissed on the basis of an argument that it will only be a drop in the ocean of corruption.  But to allow this limitation to discourage any proposal on the subject might hamper the larger cause of democracy in the long run.  Funding of election campaign may not right away dismantle the already established nexus between the political parties and their “donors”, but in the long term a step in this direction will surely have a role to play in snapping the ties of allegiance between these formidable companions pumping black money in the system. State support to campaign funding has generated strong “for and against” views in India.   Almost all the government committees formed on the issue of electoral reforms deliberated on the issue of campaign funding but fell short of coming to any concrete policy consensus which could then be tested in terms of ground reality through execution.  There have been significant proposals on the subject from civil society members who have pro-actively advocated for election funding.

Public Interest Foundation (PIF) through in-house research, supplemented with discussions with like-minded NGOs, as well as the intellectual think tanks, has evolved a feasible minimalistic framework of campaign funding for adoption and expeditious implementation. The scheme in tabular form is annexed.

As per the scheme, the administration of campaign funding will be entrusted to the ECI, who would operate the earmarked funds through a designated account for the purpose.  The funds would be non-lapsable. The fund would be created through transfers from the Union Government.  The decision of ECI on the subject of campaign funding will be final.  The Commission needs to be delegated powers to frame rules under the RPA, 1951 for the purpose.  The pattern will be same for Lok Sabha and Assembly elections.  However, it will be advisable to implement the scheme on a pilot basis in next Lok Sabha elections.

Campaign funding is not to be viewed as the expenditure related to various activities of the political parties; it is restricted to the elections only.  The ECI will make the disbursement in two stages.  The first disbursement would be made to the political party immediately after the notification of election date.  The second disbursement to the candidates would be made in two installments; first immediately after the acceptance of valid nomination form and the second after the election results. The disbursement to the candidates has been furnished in two installments to prevent non-serious candidates from siphoning of the state funding and to ensure that the funds provided to the candidate is in congruence with the valid votes polled.

The first disbursement of the fund to the political parties will be restricted to the recognized national and state parties.  The financial payout by ECI would be regulated on a scale of payment of Rs. 10 against each vote polled in favour of those party candidates whose deposit was not forfeited in the previous election for the same assembly or the parliamentary constituency as the case may be.  The total amount received by the political party as campaign fund would then be distributed to the prospective candidates who have been given official symbol.   Thus, the start-up expenditure would enable the candidates to fund their campaign in a fair and transparent manner.  The suggestion to fund the national and state parties is in the interest of ensuring built-in accountability and regulating spurious contestants. To discourage fragmentation of political parties, it is desirable to raise the benchmark for recognition of national and state parties. In the words of Chief Justice Altmas Kabir, “To gain recognition as a political party, a party has to prove itself and to establish its credibility as a serious player in the political arena of the state”.

The second stage of disbursement will be in two installments.  The payment of first installment will be made to all the candidates whose nomination form has been found valid after scrutiny and withdrawal.  The entitlement would be estimated on the basis of total electorate in the constituency. The value would be monetized on a scale of rupees ten per voter in the electoral list.  Each candidate would be given 1% of the total value as the first installment. The rationale for monetizing the electoral list is linked with the size of the constituency and efforts involved in reaching out to the electorate.  The second installment payment of stage two will be made post-election on the basis of counting and result declaration.  The eligibility for reimbursement would be restricted to the candidates who have secured at least 1/6th of the valid votes polled, i.e. those candidates whose security deposit has not been forfeited.  The payment to all such eligible candidates would be on the basis of rupees ten per valid votes polled in favour of the candidate.  The performance based reimbursement suggested is largely to ensure level playing field for all the candidates, and it is hoped that a healthy trend in the electoral politics towards a responsible party based system would gradually evolve.

Compliance of transparent account standards as may be prescribed by ECI would be a pre-condition for any disbursement.  Both the political party and the candidate would be required to maintain a separate bank account for the campaign funding.  This account would also be used for all the donations made either to the candidates or to the political party by private/corporate sources.

For any proposal on campaign funding to not become another breeding ground for more unaccounted money flowing into electoral process, it is critical to enforce the existing provision on contributions and disclosure, and strengthen them to adequately ensure that they are less susceptible to corrupt practices. Sections 77 and 78 of the RPA combined with section 10A state the compulsory provisions for the maintenance and time-bound filling of election expenses by every candidate, failing which the candidate would be disqualified from contesting election for a period of three years.  Through the extension of the purview of Section 10A of the RPA, following the Supreme Court judgment in the case L.R. Shivaramangowde vs. T.M. Chandrashekhar – AIR 1999 SC 252, three years disqualification of a candidate from contesting elections is valid even in case the accounts of election expenses filled by his/her is found to be incorrect or untrue by the ECI.  Moreover, this disqualification of three years should also apply to the candidates who may have been sworn in as elected representative on the basis of election results.  It is also proposed that the scrutiny by ECI about correctness of accounts filed should be completed in 120 days so as to minimize any form of uncertainty and political instability.

These provisions for disclosure of election expenses as detailed by the RPA, Section 77, 78, 10A for individual candidates seem comprehensive, but for the fact that it does not provide for a similar practice to be followed by the political parties should be considered a major lacuna.  The parties play a significant role in financing the election campaigns of their candidates. Moreover, given that in PIF’s proposal a significant amount of the first stage of campaign funding will be made available through the political party organization, stringent legal provision necessitating disclosure on election expenses by political party organization needs to be an important pre-requisite subject to satisfactory compliance of ECI directions on accounts keeping and audit.

Under section 29C of RPA all registered political parties are legally bound to file an annual report on all contribution received in excess of rupees twenty thousand with the ECI. A similar requirement from individual candidates under law will further strengthen the cause of transparency on contributions. Moreover the contribution limit requiring compulsory reporting  by both individual candidates as well as political party organisation should be brought down to rupees five hundred in order to facilitate maximal contributions to come within the purview of accounted money. Thus all contributions Rs. 500/- may be accepted by cheque only. Contributions below Rs. 500/- may be accepted in cash, but all donations must provide details of the donor in a format as may be prescribed by ECI.  However the fact that failure to file these accounts on contributions is not backed by strong enough deterrent, in the form of disciplinary powers to the ECI for non-compliance, weakens the overall provision and thus calls for immediate redressal. It is necessary that wrong disclosures or non-compliance of filing accounts entail severe punishment. Both ECI and IT (Income Tax) authorities will have access to the accounting details and conduct detailed scrutiny to ascertain the correctness of the disclosures made.  Parties which do not submit annual audited statements may be de-recognised and de-registered or both as the case may be.

Additionally every candidate shall disclose his/her income and assets along with those of his/her family members as defined at the time of nomination.  Every registered political party will be required to submit annual audited financial statement to ECI as is necessary binding on them under Rule 3(xix)) under Article VIII of the Guidelines and Application Format for Registration of Political Parties under Section 29A of the RPA, issued by ECI. Moreover, there shall be compulsory annual disclosure of income and assets of elected legislators.  False or incomplete disclosure by Members of Parliament may invite deterrent penalty including disqualification by the Speaker of the Lower House or the Presiding Chairman of the Upper House.

In the absence of provision for an effective auditing of the accounts relating to election expenditure by the party or the candidates, the entire framework of filing returns would be rendered futile.  Therefore, the compulsory auditing of these accounts should be entrusted to the auditors recommended by the Comptroller and Auditor General of India, which necessarily provides for a scope of cross-checking all reports submitted to both ECI and IT authorities. In addition all these accounts on election expenditure, contributions, assets as well as annual financial statements filed by both candidates and political parties submitted to the ECI should be made available for the information of the public within six months of the end of the financial year in the public domain.

Ceiling on election expenditure is another important feature which deserves review in the Indian context.  The role of black money in elections is well known.  The election expenditure for Lok Sabha election is Rs. 1 crore to Rs. 5 crores as revealed informally by contesting candidates.  Therefore, any ceiling on election expenditure will be theoretical and the elected representative begins his stint on a heap of lies.  If ceiling on election expenditure is not officially regulated, the candidate may furnish the information close to the truth.  Earlier ceiling was considered necessary to discourage role of black money and electoral rigging.  It has not served the purpose.  Therefore, the ceiling on election expenditure may be dispensed with.  The US system in fact does not have any limits set on election expenditure.  Once we have stricter norms for disclosure of expenditure and effective scrutiny of accounts, the objective would be met in a fair and transparent manner.

To assess the likely burden on the central exchequer toward state funding, an empirical exercise taking the 2009 Lok Sabha elections as the reference point was undertaken. The stage one disbursement to the recognized national and state political parties at the rate of rupees ten against each vote polled in their favour excluding the candidates whose deposits were forfeited in the previous election, i.e. the 2004 Lok Sabha elections, has been observed to be approximately Rs. 364 crores. Based on the information, the disbursement to various recognized national and state parties ranged between Rs. 103 crores (INC) and Rs. 5.4 crores (CPI). The second stage of payment in the scheme is in two parts. The candidates whose nominations are found valid would have received an average of Rs. 1.3 lakhs and has been estimated at Rs. 107 crores as total cost. The second installment of the payment due to all candidates securing more than 1/6th of the valid votes has been summed to be Rs.418 crores at all India level. Translated into average disbursement, it came to Rs. 34 lakhs per candidate except few constituencies where the total electorate is very small. There will be no need to raise revenue through any alternative source of cess or new taxes. It is feasible to meet the expenditure of campaign funding by reducing the entitlements to MPs and MLAs under various Local Area Development Schemes. It is estimated that candidates of recognized national and state parties are thus benefited by an average of about  Rs. 35-40 lakhs in the scheme, in addition to other existing privileges like free electorate sheet and free time slot in Doordarshan for propagating the manifesto of the national and state parties.

Every time the issue of state funding of election cannot be put on a hold based on the argument that political party reforms should take precedence over it.  State funding of elections as an agenda is important for a growing democracy claiming equality of opportunity for all its citizens. Moreover, taking a long-term perspective on the issue, the availability of state subvention for campaign funding will sure go on to weaken the sole dependence on private funding.  The current deadlock on the issue of state funding of election inevitably requires simultaneous attempts to cease the impasse. These attempts could demonstrate minimalistic yet critical progression in the broader adoption of election reforms as a whole in the long haul.

PIF’s Proposal on State Subvention to Campaign Funding of Elections:

CRITERION PROPOSAL OF PIF LEGAL PROVISION THAT NEEDS STRENGTHENING/AMENDMENT
Scope
  • Limited to campaign funding of elections
  • No ceiling on election expenditure
  • Applicable to both parliamentary as well as assembly elections
  • Implementation on pilot basis in parliamentary election

 

Requires amendment to Representation of People Act (RPA), 1951, Part V, Chapter VIII, Section 77. Also amendment to the Model Conduct of Elections Rules,1961
Administrating agency
  • Election Commission of India (ECI ) along with the support of State Election Commissions

 

This can be enabled through an administrative order by Union government under the Model Conduct of Elections Rules,1961.It may also be incorporated in RPA, 1951
Corpus to fund the state subvention to campaign finance
  • Creation of a permanent corpus called ‘consolidated fund for election’
  • Corpus to be managed by ECI
  • This non-lapsable corpus will be funded from consolidated fund of India

 

Requires amendment to RPA, 1951, Part V, Chapter VIII
Scheme STAGE 1 (Payment to Political Parties)

  • Only recognised national and state parties based on the results of the previous elections
  • Payment of rupees ten against each vote polled in favour of all those candidates from recognised national and state parties whose deposit was not forfeited in previous election
  • This fund to be appropriately distributed amongst the candidates with party symbol

STAGE 2 (Payment to Candidates)

INSTALLMENT 1:

  • Payable to all candidates whose nomination held valid after scrutiny and withdrawal of nominations
  • To be made directly to the candidates of all parties and also those contesting as independent
  • Amount due to each such candidate would be 1% x (Total number of electorate of that constituency x rupees ten)

INSTALLMENT 2

  • Payment will be performance based reimbursement post elections based on election results of the polls
  • Directly to the candidates
  • Only threshold criterion would be that the candidates should have secured atleast 1/6thof the valid votes polled, i.e. those candidates whose security deposit was not forfeited
  • Amount due to each eligible candidates would be calculated at the rate of rupees ten against each vote polled in favour of such eligible candidates
Requires amendment to Representation of People Act (RPA), 1951, Part V, Chapter VIII

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pre-conditions for disbursement
  • In the Election expenditure statement all political parties to submit their audited annual financial report to ECI within 60 days of the end of each financial year
  • Separate bank account of political parties and eligible candidates for the purpose of election expenditure
  • All other contributions, in addition to state subvention in regards to election expense to be received in this particular account
  • All transactions of this account to be reported
  • This bank account to be linked to UID to facilitate tracking of any illegitimate money transactions
  • Complete disclosure on all contributions received by both party and candidates
  • Complete disclosure on all election expenditure made by both party and candidates to ECI within 30 days after elections

 

Requires amendment & strengthening of Representation of People Act, 1951, Section 29C 

 

Requires amendment to Representation of People Act, 1951, Section 77,78, 10A

 

 

Strengthening of Rule 3(xix)) under Article VIII of the Guidelines and Application Format for Registration of Political Parties under Section 29A of the RPA, issued by ECI

Disclosure On Contributions:

  • To be filed by both political parties and candidates with the ECI
  • Contributions above Rs.500 to be made by cheque
  • All contributions must provide details of the donor in the format prescribed by ECI
  • Besides disqualification for state-funding of elections, other strong civil and criminal punitive measures to be introduced for non-compliance
  • Providing powers to ECI for de-recognition, de-registration  in addition to withdrawal of IT exemption for punishing non-compliance on disclosure of all contribution by both political parties and individual candidates

On Election Expenditure:

  • To be disclosed by both political parties and individual candidates with the ECI within 30 days
  • Non disclosure by individual candidates is punishable under law with disqualification from contesting of elections for three years
  • Similar requirement and provision for compliance from political parties on all expenditure expenses backed with legal sanctions
  • In case disqualification for three years is declared by ECI, then this disqualification should stand valid even if this candidate has already won and taken oath in the lok sabha or state assembly
  • ECI to certify the correctness of the election expenditure accounts submitted in a time-bound manner within 120 days
  • No reimbursement towards campaign funding in  cases of non-compliance on true, time-bound filing of election expenses by both political parties and individual candidates

On Asset Statement:

  • Every candidate shall disclose his/her income and assets along with those of his/her family members in the new format for filing of affidavit effective from 2011 at the time of filing nominations.  False or incomplete disclosure may invite deterrent penalty including disqualification
  • Every Member of Parliament to compulsorily file annual disclosure on income and assets to the Speaker of the Lower House or the Presiding Chairman of the Upper House of elected legislators.  Non-compliance may invite deterrent penalty to be decided by the presiding authority

 

 

Requires strengthening and amendment to Representation of People Act, 1951, Section 29C

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Requires amendment to Representation of People Act, 1951, Section 77,78, 10A

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Requires amendment to RPA, 1951, Section 33A

Requires strengthening and amendment to the Members of Lok Sabha (Declaration of Assets and

Liabilities) Rules,2004

 

Requires strengthening and amendment to the Members of Rajya Sabha (Declaration of Assets and Liabilities)

Rules, 2004

Audit requirements
  • Compulsory auditing of all accounts/disclosures on assets, contributions as well as annual financial statements by both political parties as well as individual candidates should be entrusted to the auditors recommended by the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG)

 

Public Information
  • All these accounts on election expenditure and contribution filed by both candidates and political parties to be placed in public domain
  • To be done within six months of the end of the financial year by ECI

 

Requires strengthening of Representation of People Act, 1951, Section 33A
Projected Expenditure & Deficit
  • Total expenditure incurred under this model as per the information available on Lok Sabha elections  2009 is approximately  Rs. 1000 cr.

(This article was published in Business Standard on 30th December, 2012 and 6th January, 2013)

Perils of a prolonged election schedule

The election schedule for parliamentary elections as announced by Election Commission of India (ECI) on 5 March 2014 has raised serious issues regarding the efficiency, cost and prolonged period of administrative paralysis. It also needs to be tested from the equity point of view in terms of equal opportunity to all the contesting parties in a deepening fractious polity. Election notification from the ECI began on 14 March 2014. The last notification for polling was on 17 April 2014. The poll has been scheduled in nine phases beginning 7 April 2014 to 12 May 2014 with the counting to take place on 16 May 2014. Thus, a total period of 72 days will be taken in the completion of parliamentary elections.

Near paralysis in governance

The model code of conduct becomes effective once the election is notified. Effectively both the State and the Union Governments informally move into slow pace of governance. Any new decisions either in terms of investment or other forms of policy initiative are not taken if such a decision is likely to impact the results of the election. The bureaucracy loath to any form of risk adopts wait and watch mode. The ministers and other key political functionaries get busy in their respective constituencies with little time for any disposal of serious official matters. The truth is that the Government functioning comes to a halt except minimum necessary maintenance though the ECI keeps clarifying that there is no stoppage of normal activities. It also impacts the foreign policy, as of other countries governments decide to postpone any engagement till the next government is installed. The security matters in some respects also get affected as procurement decisions in the Defence Ministry do not get easy passage.

Implications

Such a long duration of electoral process adversely affects the campaign efforts of political parties. Given a very live and vibrant media, it is difficult to escape from the whispering campaign. Though exit polls are banned, yet election prospects get reported indirectly signaling the party better placed to romp home. The disinformation campaign is at its peak and the confused voter further gets bewildered.

The cost involved in conducting the election process is huge. Firstly, it is near impossible for the candidates to restrict the expenditure within the ceiling prescribed for the parliamentary elections. Longer the period greater will be the violation of the expenditure ceiling. The truth becomes the major casualty. It also costs the exchequer very heavily. The polling in 1984 for parliamentary elections was in three phases with approximate expenditure of Rs. 82 crore. Since then it has been escalating and there is a fair estimate that the expenditure on conducting the current parliamentary elections would cross the thousand crore mark.

Scheduling process and remedy

It is appreciated that the schedule for the election is determined in consultation with Home Ministry and other agencies responsible for law and order and internal security. The State Government are also consulted. The agencies responsible for mobilizing police forces are under strain and favour prolonged election schedule so that the forces are ale to move from one corner of the country to the other. However, there is a need for moderation and more efficient deployment so as to complete the responsibility in shorter span of time and thus resume normal law and order/maintenance activity.

A quick glance to the schedule of election would make a strong case for shorter span of electoral process. Barring third, fifth and sixth phase, which account for 331 parliamentary constituencies, the remaining parliamentary constituencies could be easily be accommodated in two more phases. After all, there is no case for first, second, fourth and ninth phase with 6, 7, 5 and 41 parliamentary constituencies respectively only. The feasibility of holding of about 100 parliamentary constituencies in one phase is well within the practical limits. It should be possible to ensure free and fair elections within five phases in a time span of about three weeks.

The experience of other countries should guide ECI for keeping a bare minimum duration for elections. South Africa, UK, US have one day poll. Brazil and France, who have run off dates on account of proportional representation, conclude in a shorter period barring campaignperiod for final results than in India.

Clubbing of Assembly elections

There is another and more serious aspect to the electoral process. The Assembly and Parliamentary elections do not necessarily coincide due to constitutional and electoral provisions. The country is always in an election mode. To say the least, it distracts our focus from growth and development to totally unproductive, acrimonious and extraneous agenda. During 2012-13, 11 Assembly elections in different States were held. Again, in the last quarter of the current year, elections are scheduled in three to four States. While it is appreciated that a co-terminious elections of Assembly and Parliament will require constitutional amendment, it should be possible for the ECI to club the elections of States with the parliamentary elections in cases where they become due either before or after in a span of six months of Parliament elections. This would at least curtail significantly the “tamasha” of elections and the nation would focus more on the agenda of growth.

Democracy is the lifeline of our nation. It is the foundation of our constitutional fabric. Electoral process is a means to established democratic institutional framework. With the rising cost of elections and ever increasing stakes in capturing power, the longer duration of election process has negative impact and does not strengthen the cause of democracy, which it professes to promote.

Democracy is the lifeline of our nation. It is the foundation of our constitutional fabric. Electoral process is a means to established democratic institutional framework. With the rising cost of elections and ever increasing stakes in capturing power, the longer duration of election process has negative impact and does not strengthen the cause of democracy, which it professes to promote.

By Writer is former Chairman, Telecom Regulatory Authority of India
And presently Director, Public Interest Foundation
e-mail: Director@publicinterestfoundation.com

(This article was published in The Economic Times on 13 May, 2014)